Global Asthma Network survey suggests more national asthma strategies could reduce burden of asthma

BACKGROUND: Several countries or regions within countries have an effective national asthma strategy resulting in a reduction of the large burden of asthma to individuals and society. There has been no systematic appraisal of the extent of national asthma strategies in the world. METHODS: The Global Asthma Network (GAN) undertook an email survey of 276 Principal Investigators of GAN centres in 120 countries, in 2013-2014. One of the questions was: "Has a national asthma strategy been developed in your country for the next five years? For children? For adults?". RESULTS: Investigators in 112 (93.3%) countries answered this question. Of these, 26 (23.2%) reported having a national asthma strategy for children and 24 (21.4%) for adults; 22 (19.6%) countries had a strategy for both children and adults; 28 (25%) had a strategy for at least one age group. In countries with a high prevalence of current wheeze, strategies were significantly more common than in low prevalence countries (11/13 (85%) and 7/31 (22.6%) respectively, p < 0.001). Interpretation. In 25% countries a national asthma strategy was reported. A large reduction in the global burden of asthma could be potentially achieved if more countries had an effective asthma strategy

No disponible

Global Asthma Network survey suggests more national asthma strategies could reduce burden of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Several countries or regions within countries have an effective national asthma strategy resulting in a reduction of the large burden of asthma to individuals and society. There has been no systematic appraisal of the extent of national asthma strategies in the world. METHODS: The Global Asthma Network (GAN) undertook an email survey of 276 Principal Investigators of GAN centres in 120 countries, in 2013-2014. One of the questions was: "Has a national asthma strategy been developed in your country for the next five years? For children? For adults?". RESULTS: Investigators in 112 (93.3%) countries answered this question. Of these, 26 (23.2%) reported having a national asthma strategy for children and 24 (21.4%) for adults; 22 (19.6%) countries had a strategy for both children and adults; 28 (25%) had a strategy for at least one age group. In countries with a high prevalence of current wheeze, strategies were significantly more common than in low prevalence countries (11/13 (85%) and 7/31 (22.6%) respectively, p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: In 25% countries a national asthma strategy was reported. A large reduction in the global burden of asthma could be potentially achieved if more countries had an effective asthma strategy.

Can geodata be used to determine the distribution of fast food outlets in relation to the prevalence and severity of asthma? A novel methodology

Research question: Can the distribution of fast food outlets be obtained and effectively used to identify if there is a relationship between the placement of these and the prevalence and severity of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema (ARE) in children and adolescents? METHOD: Fast food restaurant location data was obtained for seven countries. Data from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) was used from 53 centres in the same seven countries. Each ISAAC centre provided a detailed map of the study area. The location of restaurants and ISAAC centres were overlaid using the ArcMap software, and the number of restaurants within each ISAAC centre counted. Bivariate regression analysis was used to compare outlet density with ARE prevalence and severity. RESULTS: The results from the analyses showed a positive (non-significant) trend on a regression plot between outlet density and ARE severity. This project has shown that it is practical to systematically obtain and map fast food outlets and compare their distribution worldwide with the prevalence and severity of diseases, in this case ARE. The devised methodology has proven to be an efficient way to obtain restaurant distribution data in a form that is manageable and suitable to compare with area based disease prevalences. This project has shown that a larger scale investigation is both feasible and warranted

No disponible

Can geodata be used to determine the distribution of fast food outlets in relation to the prevalence and severity of asthma? A novel methodology.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can the distribution of fast food outlets be obtained and effectively used to identify if there is a relationship between the placement of these and the prevalence and severity of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema (ARE) in children and adolescents? METHOD: Fast food restaurant location data was obtained for seven countries. Data from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) was used from 53 centres in the same seven countries. Each ISAAC centre provided a detailed map of the study area. The location of restaurants and ISAAC centres were overlaid using the ArcMap software, and the number of restaurants within each ISAAC centre counted. Bivariate regression analysis was used to compare outlet density with ARE prevalence and severity. RESULTS: The results from the analyses showed a positive (non-significant) trend on a regression plot between outlet density and ARE severity. This project has shown that it is practical to systematically obtain and map fast food outlets and compare their distribution worldwide with the prevalence and severity of diseases, in this case ARE. The devised methodology has proven to be an efficient way to obtain restaurant distribution data in a form that is manageable and suitable to compare with area based disease prevalences. This project has shown that a larger scale investigation is both feasible and warranted.

How are ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ defined in publications regarding asthma and related diseases?

BACKGROUND: Global variations in the prevalence of asthma and related diseases have suggested that environmental factors are causative, and that factors associated with urbanisation are of particular interest. A range of definitions for 'urban' and 'rural' have been used in articles on asthma and related diseases, making it difficult to assess their importance as aetiological factors. This study sets out to examine such definitions used in the literature. METHODS: Medical and social science databases were searched for articles that made distinctions of 'urban' and/or 'rural' in the context of asthma and related diseases. RESULTS: The search identified 73 articles and categorised four types of definitions. A specific definition of urban or rural was used in 19 (26%) articles. Nine (12%) articles used non-specific and/or administrative definitions. There were 23 (32%) articles that described locations as 'urban' or 'rural' but did not indicate if the description defined 'urban' or 'rural'. Distinctions were made between urban and rural locations without a description or definition in 22 (30%) articles. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in the definitions of 'urban' and 'rural' in articles regarding asthma and related diseases. It would be advantageous to have clearer and more precise definitions of 'urban' and 'rural' which could facilitate aetiological research and also comparisons between locations, especially in international studies

No disponible

How are 'urban' and 'rural' defined in publications regarding asthma and related diseases?

BACKGROUND: Global variations in the prevalence of asthma and related diseases have suggested that environmental factors are causative, and that factors associated with urbanisation are of particular interest. A range of definitions for 'urban' and 'rural' have been used in articles on asthma and related diseases, making it difficult to assess their importance as aetiological factors. This study sets out to examine such definitions used in the literature. METHODS: Medical and social science databases were searched for articles that made distinctions of 'urban' and/or 'rural' in the context of asthma and related diseases. RESULTS: The search identified 73 articles and categorised four types of definitions. A specific definition of urban or rural was used in 19 (26%) articles. Nine (12%) articles used non-specific and/or administrative definitions. There were 23 (32%) articles that described locations as 'urban' or 'rural' but did not indicate if the description defined 'urban' or 'rural'. Distinctions were made between urban and rural locations without a description or definition in 22 (30%) articles. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in the definitions of 'urban' and 'rural' in articles regarding asthma and related diseases. It would be advantageous to have clearer and more precise definitions of 'urban' and 'rural' which could facilitate aetiological research and also comparisons between locations, especially in international studies.